Scientific Assessment of the Welfare of Dry Sows Kept in Individual Accommodations

Authors

  • Stanley E. Curtis University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign image/svg+xml Author
  • Rodney B. Baker Iowa State University of Science and Technology image/svg+xml Author
  • Mark J. Estienne Author
  • P. Brendan Lynch Moorepark Research Centre Author
  • John J. McGlone Texas Tech University image/svg+xml Author
  • Bjarne K. Pedersen Danish Farm Design A/S Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62300/bvpvs591

Keywords:

Dry Sows, Pork Production, Inidividual Gestation Accomodations

Abstract

The use of individual gestation accommodations (IGAs) for dry sows in commercial pork production is an issue that has raised much debate. Public perceptions and misconceptions of welfare issues have the potential to dramatically impact swine production. The nine-member international task force of this new issue paper critically evaluates the scientific evidence of IGAs for sows, including considerations for behavior, nutrition and feeding, reproduction, clinical examination and health, manure management, worker safety, and system design. The authors indicate that no compelling evidence exists from scientific evaluations and comparisons of dry-sow keeping systems that, overall, either individual or group accommodation is more appropriate than the other.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Downloads

Published

2009-03-05

Issue

Section

Issue Papers

How to Cite

Curtis, S. E., Baker, R. B., Estienne, M. J., Lynch, P. B., McGlone, J. J., & Pedersen, B. K. (2009). Scientific Assessment of the Welfare of Dry Sows Kept in Individual Accommodations. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST). https://doi.org/10.62300/bvpvs591

Similar Articles

21-30 of 48

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.